Round Eight : Cinebench 11.5
CPU: AMD FX 8150 @ 4.8 Ghz
RESULTS:
CPU Performance :
intel i5 2500k @ 4.8 Ghz - - 7.57 (link)
AMD FX 8150 @ 4.8 Ghz - - 7.90
intel i7 2600k @ 4.8 Ghz - - 9.28 (link)
intel i7 3930x @ 4.8 Ghz - - 13.79 (link)
We can see here that FX easily beats the i5 2500k, but then gets trumped by an equally clocked i7 2600k. We can really notice the difference due to HT.
Single Core Performance :
intel i5 2500k @ 3.7 Ghz - - 1.48 (link)
AMD FX 8150 @ 4.8 Ghz - - 1.19
intel i7 970 @ 3.46 Ghz - - 1.17 (link)
AMD Phenom II X4 980 @ 3.7 Ghz - - 1.10 (link)
AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.92 Ghz - - 1.18
AMD Phenom II X6 1100t @ 4.2 Ghz - - 1.26
AMD Athlon II X4 @ 4.11 Ghz - - 1.15
This benchmarks shows the weakness of Bulldozer's single core performance more than Techarp's h.264 benchmark, but it still manages to beat Nahelem i7 at ~3.5 Ghz.
The scaling of 6.66 implies that per core there is roughly ~0.83 scaling.
Open GL performance:
Gaming Rig vs. Workstation
AMD FX 8150 @ 4.8 Ghz with 6990 @ 990/1500 - - 72.85
intel Xeon X5677 @ 3.47 Ghz (Turbo 3.73Ghz) - - 69.07 (link)
with AMD V9800 4 Gb
No comments:
Post a Comment