ROUND 9: AIDA64
|  | 
| Does FX stand a chance? | 
CPU AES :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
CPU HASH :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
CPU PHOTOWORX :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
CPU QUEEN :     
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
CPU ZLIB :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
FPU JULIA :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
FPU SINJULIA :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
FPU VP8 :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
FPU MANDEL :
|  | 
| BEFORE | 
|  | 
| AFTER | 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (Patch vs. No-Patch)
CPU Tests -
AES : +7.3% performance
Hash : +0.2% performance
Photoworx : +3.3% performance 
Queen : +0.1% performance
ZLib : +0.1% performance
FPU Tests -
Julia : +0.3% performance
SinJulia : +0.0% performance
VP8 : +1.4% performance
Mandel : +0.3% performance
We can see here that the patch gives a decent boost in performance with AIDA64 across the board with none of the benchmarks showing worse performance than with pre-patched Windows 7. Overall FX fairs fairly well, but the only benchmark where it pulls ahead of all the other CPUs is in CPU Hash. The AMD FX 8150 @ 4.8 ghz manages a top 2 spot when compared to the other CPUs in 4/8 tests and a top 3 spot in 5/8 tests. Naturally the 3960x @ 3.8 ghz Turbo manages to beat FX in most tests, but not nearly as singificantly as one would expect.
 
Amdfx: Aida64 Benchmarks! Windows 7 Fx Patch Preview! >>>>> Download Now
ReplyDelete>>>>> Download Full
Amdfx: Aida64 Benchmarks! Windows 7 Fx Patch Preview! >>>>> Download LINK
>>>>> Download Now
Amdfx: Aida64 Benchmarks! Windows 7 Fx Patch Preview! >>>>> Download Full
>>>>> Download LINK yw